The IAU 2000-2012 Resolutions on Reference Systems
The following gives information on the International Astronomical Union (IAU) and
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) resolutions that
relate to reference systems, and in particular those after the IAU 1997
adoption of the International Celestial Reference System and Frame (ICRS/ICRF).
The following table summarises the particular resolutions indicating their purpose.
While the sections below give more details of the resolutions and links to the IAU and
related documents.
Unless specified all resolutions are IAU resolutions.
| Aim of the IAU / IUGG Resolutions - to deliver consistency with μas accuracy |
| Improvements in the definition of the astronomical reference systems |
Adoption of high accuracy astronomical models |
Refinement in the concepts and definition of the EOP |
Improvement in the definition of coordinate time scales |
Year | IAU / IUGG Resolutions |
2000 / IUGG 2003 | B1.3 Definition of BCRS and the GCRS
B1.5 Extended relativistic framework for time transformation |
B1.6 IAU 2000 precession-nutation model |
B1.7 Definition of CIP
B1.8 Definition and use of CEO and TEO |
B1.9 Re-definition of Terrestrial Time (TT) |
2006 / IUGG 2007 | IUGG Resolution 2 Definition of GTRS and ITRS as a specific GTRS |
B1 Adoption of the P03 precession model and definition of the ecliptic |
B2 Supplement to the IAU 2000 Resolutions:
Rec 1 Harmonizing intermediate to the pole and the origin
Rec 2 Default orientation of the BCRS/GCRS |
B3 Re-definition of Dynamical Barycentric Time (TDB) |
2009 / IUGG 2011 | B2 Adoption of the IAU 2009 System of Astronomical Constants |
B3 Adoption of ICRF2 |
IUGG Resolution 3 adoption of ICRF2 |
|
2012 | B2 Re-definition of the astronomical unit of length |
|
|
|
2015 | B3 Adoption of conversion constants for nominal units |
|
|
|
2018 / IUGG 2019 | B1 Adoption of the ITRS |
B2 Adoption of ICRF3 |
IUGG Resolution 2 recommending the ITRF |
|
2021 / IUGG | B2 Recommendation for improvement and consistency for the Earth’s rotation models | B3 Adoption of Gaia optical reference frame (Gaia-CRF3) |
IUGG |
|
IAU 2000 and IUGG 2003 Resolutions
The following resolutions were adopted by the IAU in 2000 and the IUGG in 2003.
- B1.3 - Definition of the Barycentric Celestial Reference System (BCRS)
and the Geocentric Celestial Reference System (GCRS)
- B1.5 - Extended Relativistic framework for time transformation
- B1.6 - IAU 2000 Precession-Nutation Model. The nutation model was designated MHB2000A.
- B1.7 - Definition of Celestial Intermediate Pole (CIP)
- B1.8 - Definition and use of Celestial Ephemeris Origin (CEO) and Terrestrial Ephemeris Origin (TEO)
- B1.9 - Re-definition of Terrestrial Time (TT)
Definition of barycentric celestial reference system (BCRS) and
geocentric celestial reference system (GCRS)
The following link provides the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly. This resolution is complex with metric tensor equations
and thus is best studied by downloading the document.
Extended relativistic framework for time transformations and
realisation of coordinate times in the solar system
The following link provides the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly. This resolution is complex with metric tensor equations
and thus is best studied by downloading the document.
IAU 2000 precession-nutation model
The following English version is extracted from the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU Accepts
the conclusions of the IAU-IUGG WG on Non-rigid Earth Nutation Theory
published by Dehant et al., 1999, Celest. Mech., 72 (4),
245-310 and the recent comparisons between the various possibilities,
and
Recommends
- that, beginning on 1 January 2003, the IAU 1976 Precession Model
and IAU 1980 Theory of Nutation, be replaced by the precession-nutation
model IAU 2000A (MHB2000 based on the transfer functions of Mathews,
Herring and Buffett, 2000 - submitted to the Journal of Geophysical
Research) for those who need a model at the 0.2 mas level, or its
shorter version IAU 2000B for those who need a model only at the
1 mas level, together with their associated precession and obliquity
rates, and their associated celestial pole offsets at J2000.0, to be
published in the IERS Conventions 2000, and
Encourages
- the continuation of theoretical developments of non-rigid Earth
nutation series,
- the continuation of VLBI observations to increase the accuracy
of the nutation series and the nutation model, and to monitor the
unpredictable free core nutation, and
- the development of new expressions for precession consistent
with the lAU 2000A model.
Definition of Celestial Intermediate Pole
The following English version is extracted from the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- that the Celestial Intermediate Pole (CIP) be the pole, the
motion of which is specified in the Geocentric Celestial
Reference System (GCRS, see Resolution B1.3) by motion of the
Tisserand mean axis of the Earth with periods greater than
two days,
- that the direction of the CIP at J2000.0 be offset from the
direction of the pole of the GCRS in a manner consistent with
the IAU 2000A (see Resolution
B1.6)
precession-nutation model,
- that the motion of the CIP in the GCRS be realised by the
IAU 2000 A model for precession and forced nutation for periods
greater than two days plus additional time-dependent corrections
provided by the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS)
through appropriate astro-geodetic observations,
- that the motion of the CIP in the International Terrestrial
Reference System (ITRS) be provided by the IERS through
appropriate astro-geodetic observations and models including
high-frequency variations,
- that for highest precision, corrections to the models for the
motion of the CIP in the ITRS may be estimated using procedures
specified by the IERS, and
- that implementation of the CIP be on 1 January 2003.
Notes
- The forced nutations with periods less than two days are included
in the model for the motion of the CIP in the ITRS.
- The Tisserand mean axis of the Earth corresponds to the mean
surface geographic axis, quoted B axis, in Seidelmann, 1982,
Celest. Mech., 27, 79-106.
- As a consequence of this resolution, the Celestial Ephemeris Pole
is no longer necessary.
Definition and use of celestial and terrestrial ephemeris origins
The following English version is extracted from the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- the use of the non-rotating origin in the Geocentric
Celestial Reference System (GCRS) and that this point be
designated as the Celestial Ephemeris Origin (CEO) on the
equator of the Celestial Intermediate Pole (CIP),
- the use of the non-rotating origin in the International
Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and that this point be
designated as the Terrestrial Ephemeris Origin (TEO) on the
equator of the CIP,
- that UT1 be linearly proportional to the Earth Rotation Angle
defined as the angle measured along the equator of the CIP
between the unit vectors directed toward the CEO and the TEO,
- that the transformation between the ITRS and GCRS be specified
by the position of the CIP in the GCRS, the position of the CIP
in the ITRS, and the Earth Rotation Angle,
- that the International Earth Rotation Service (IERS) take steps
to implement this by 1 January 2003, and
- that the IERS will continue to provide users with data and
algorithms for the conventional transformations.
Note
- The position of the CEO can be computed from the IAU 2000A model
for precession and nutation of the CIP and from the current
values of the offset of the CIP from the pole of the ICRF at
J2000.0 using the development provided by Capitaine et al. (2000).
- The position of the TEO is only slightly dependent on polar
motion and can be extrapolated as done by Capitaine et al. (2000)
using the IERS data
- The linear relationship between the Earth's rotation angle θ
and UT1 should ensure the continuity in phase and rate of UT1
with the value obtained by the conventional relationship between
Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time (GMST) and UT1. This is accomplished
by the following relationship :
θ(UT1) = 2 π (0.779057 2732640 + 1.002737 811911 35448 x (Julian UT1 date − 245 1545.0))
References
- Guinot, B., 1979, in D.D. McCarthy and J.D. Pilkington (eds.),
Time and the Earth's Rotation, D. Reidel Pub. 7-18.
- Capitaine, N., Guinot, B. and Mc Carthy, D. D.,
2000, Astron. Astrophys., 335, 398-405.
Updated IAU 2006 -- Harmonising the name of the pole and origin to intermediate
The first recommendation of the
2006 IAU Resolution B2
re-named both the Celestial Ephemeris Origin (CEO) and Terrestrial Ephemeris Origin (TEO) as the
Celestial Intermediate Origin (CIO) and the
Terrestrial Intermediate Origin (TIO), respectively.
Re-definition of Terrestrial Time TT
The following English version is extracted from the
IAU 2000 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- that TT be a time scale differing from TCG by a constant rate:
dTT/dTCG = 1 − LG
where LG = 6.969 290 134 x 10−10 is
a defining constant.
Note LG was defined by the IAU Resolution A4 (1991)
in its Recommendation 4 as equal to UG / c2
where UG is the geopotential at the geoid.
LG is now used as a defining constant.
IAU 2006 and IUGG 2007 Resolutions
IAU 2006 resolutions:
- B1 - Adoption of the P03 Precession Theory and Definition of the Ecliptic
- B2 - Supplement to the IAU 2000 Resolutions on reference systems
- Harmonizing intermediate to the pole and the origin
- Default orientation of the BCRS/GCRS
- B3 - Re-definition of Dynamical Barycentric Time (TDB)
IUGG 2007 Resolution 2:
- The definition of Geocentric Terrestrial Reference System (GTRS) and
International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) as a specific GTRS.
Adoption of the P03 Precession Theory and Definition of the Ecliptic
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2006 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU Accepts
the conclusions of the IAU Division I Working Group on Precession and
the Ecliptic published in Hilton et al.
(2006, Celest. Mech. 94, 351), and
Recommends
- that the terms lunisolar precession and planetary precession be replaced
by precession of the equator and precession of the ecliptic, respectively,
- that, beginning on 1 January 2009, the precession component of the IAU 2000A
precession-nutation model be replaced by the P03 precession theory, of
Capitaine et al. (2003, A&A, 412, 567-586) for the precession of the equator
(Eqs. 37) and the precession of the ecliptic (Eqs. 38); the same paper
provides the polynomial developments for the P03 primary angles and a
number of derived quantities for use in both the equinox based and CIO
based paradigms,
- that the choice of precession parameters be left to the user, and
- that the ecliptic pole should be explicitly defined by the mean orbital
angular momentum vector of the Earth-Moon barycenter in the Barycentric
Celestial Reference System (BCRS), and this definition should be
explicitly stated to avoid confusion with other, older definitions.
Notes
- Formulas for constructing the precession matrix using various
parameterizations are given in Eqs. 1, 6, 7, 11, 12 and 22 of
Hilton et al. (2006, Celest. Mech., 94, 351). The recommended
polynomial developments for the various parameters are given in Table 1
of the same paper, including the P03 expressions set out in expressions
(37) to (41) of Capitaine et al. (2003) and Tables 3-5 of
Capitaine et al. (2005, A&A, 432, 355).
- The time rate of change in the dynamical form factor in P03 is
dJ2/dt = −0.3001 x 10−9 century−1.
Supplement to the IAU 2000 Resolutions on reference systems
The following two recommendations are extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2006 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
RECOMMENDATION 1. Harmonizing the name of the pole and origin to intermediate
The IAU recommends
- that, the designation intermediate be used to describe the moving
celestial and terrestrial reference systems defined in the 2000 IAU
Resolutions and the various related entities, and
- that the terminology Celestial Intermediate Origin (CIO) and
Terrestrial Intermediate Origin (TIO) be used in place of the
previously introduced "Celestial Ephemeris Origin" (CEO) and
"Terrestrial Ephemeris Origin" (TEO), and
- that authors carefully define acronyms used to designate entities of
astronomical reference systems to avoid possible confusion.
RECOMMENDATION 2. Default orientation of the Barycentric Celestial Reference System
(BCRS) and Geocentric Celestial Reference System (GCRS)
The IAU recommends
- that the BCRS definition is completed with the following: "For all
practical applications, unless otherwise stated, the BCRS is assumed
to be oriented according to the ICRS axes. The orientation of the GCRS
is derived from the ICRS-oriented BCRS."
Re-definition of Barycentric Dynamical Time, TDB
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2006 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
Notes
- JDTCB is the TCB Julian date. Its value is
T0 = 244 3144.5003 725 for the event 1977 January 1
00h 00m 00s TAI at the geocenter, and
it increases by one for each 86400s of TCB.
- The fixed value that this definition assigns to LB is a current
estimate of LC + LG − LC x LG,
where LG is given in IAU Resolution
B1.9
(2000) and LC has been determined (Irwin & Fukushima, 1999,
A&A 348, 642) using the JPL ephemeris DE405. When using the
JPL Planetary Ephemeris DE405, the defining LB value effectively
eliminates a linear drift between TDB and TT, evaluated at the geocenter.
When realizing TCB using other ephemerides, the difference between TDB and TT,
evaluated at the geocenter, may include some linear drift, not expected
to exceed 1 ns per year.
- The difference between TDB and TT, evaluated at the surface of the Earth,
remains under 2 ms for several millennia around the present epoch.
- The independent time argument of the JPL ephemeris DE405, which is called
Teph (Standish, A&A, 336, 381, 1998), is for practical
purposes the same as TDB defined in this Resolution.
- The constant term TDB0 is chosen to provide reasonable consistency with
the widely used TDB − TT formula of Fairhead & Bretagnon (A&A 229, 240, 1990).
n.b. The presence of TDB0 means that TDB is not synchronized
with TT, TCG and TCB at 1977 Jan 1.0 TAI at the geocenter.
- For solar system ephemerides development the use of TCB is encouraged.
Geocentric and International Terrestrial Reference Systems (GTRS and ITRS)
The following is extracted from the
IUGG 2007 Resolution document.
The International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG)
Endorses
- The definition of a Geocentric Terrestrial Reference System (GTRS)
in agreement with the 2000 IAU resolution
B1.3,
- the definition of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS)
as the specific GTRS for which the orientation is operationally
maintained in continuity with past international agreements
(BIH orientation), and
Adopts
- the ITRS as preferred GTRS for scientific and technical
applications, and
Urges
- Other communities such as geo-spatial information and navigation
communities to do the same.
IAU 2009 and IUGG 2011 Resolutions
IAU 2009 resolutions:
- B2 - Adoption of the IAU 2009 System of Astronomical Constants
- B3 - Adoption of the Second Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame, ICRF2
IAU 2009 Astronomical Constants
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2009 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- that the list of previously published constants compiled in the report of the
Working Group on Numerical Standards of Fundamental Astronomy (NSFA)
be adopted as the IAU 2009 System of Astronomical Constants.
- that Current Best Estimates
of Astronomical Constants be permanently maintained as an electronic document,
- that, in order to ensure the integrity of the CBEs, IAU Division I (now Division A)
develop a formal procedure to adopt new values and archive older versions of the CBEs, and
- that the IAU establish within IAU Division I (now Division A) a permanent body to
maintain the CBEs for fundamental astronomy.
These recommends have been enhanced by adding the links to the web pages that
have been developed by the permanent body designated in item 4 above, the IAU Functional Working Group for
Numerical Standards for Fundamental Astronomy (NSFA).
The Second Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2)
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2009 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU resolves
- that from 01 January 2010 the fundamental astrometric realization of the
International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) shall be the Second
Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2) as
constructed by the IERS/IVS working group on the ICRF in conjunction with
the IAU Division I (now Division A) Working Group on the Second Realization
of the International Celestial Reference Frame (see note 1),
- that the organizations responsible for astrometric and geodetic VLBI
observing programs (e.g. IERS, IVS) take appropriate measures to continue
existing and develop improved VLBI observing and analysis programs to both
maintain and improve ICRF2,
- that the IERS, together with other relevant organizations continue efforts
to improve and densify high accuracy reference frames defined at other
wavelengths and continue to improve ties between these reference frames and
ICRF2.
Note 1: The Second Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame by Very Long Baseline Interferometry,
Presented on behalf of the IERS / IVS Working Group, Alan Fey, David Gordon and Christopher S. Jacobs (eds.).
IERS Technical Note 35
Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 2009.
The Second Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2)
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IUGG 2011 Resolution document.
The IUGG urges:
- that the ICRF2 shall be used as a standard for all future applications in
geodesy and astrometry,
- that the organizations responsible for geodetic VLBI observing programs
take appropriate measures to continue existing and develop improved
VLBI observing and analysis programs to both maintain and improve
ICRF2,
- that highest consistency between the ICRF, the International Terrestrial
Reference Frame (ITRF), and the Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP) as
observed and realized by the IAG and its components such as the IERS
should be a primary goal in all future realizations of the ICRS.
IAU 2012 Resolutions
The Re-definition of the astronomical unit of length (au)
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2012 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- that the astronomical unit be re-defined to be a conventional unit of length equal to
149 597 870 700 m exactly, in agreement with the value adopted in IAU 2009 Resolution B2,
- that this definition of the astronomical unit be used with all time scales such as TCB, TDB,
TCG, TT, etc.,
- that the Gaussian gravitational constant k be deleted from the system of astronomical
constants,
- that the value of the solar mass parameter,
GMS, be determined observationally in SI units, and
- that the unique symbol "au" be used for the astronomical unit.
Details about constants, and the astronomical unit
in particular, is given by the IAU WG for Numerical Standards for Fundamental Astronomy
(NSFA) and is
listed in Table 6
of the SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (8th edition, updated 2014).
IAU 2015 Resolutions
Recommended nominal conversion constants for selected solar and planetary
properties
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2015 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends
- that whenever expressing stellar properties in units of the solar radius, total
solar irradiance, solar luminosity, solar effective temperature, or solar mass
parameter, that the nominal values be used, which are by definition exact and are expressed in SI units.
- that the same be done for expressing planetary properties in units of the equatorial and polar radii of the Earth and Jupiter
(expressed in meters).
- See PDF resolution for the exact values of the recommended conversion factors.
IAU 2018 and IUGG 2019 Resolutions
Geocentric and International Terrestrial Reference Systems and Frames
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2018 B1 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends:
- That the ITRS be adopted as the preferred GTRS for scientific and technical applications
- That the IAU engage, together with other concerned organizations such as the IUGG
and the International Association of Geodesy, with the United Nations (UN) Global
Geospatial Information Management (GGIM) Subcommittee on Geodesy in order to
promote the implementation of the UN-GGIM Road Map for the Global Geodetic Reference Frame.
Geocentric and International Terrestrial Reference Systems and Frames
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2018 Resolution B2 document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends:
- from 1 January 2019, the fundamental realization of the International Celestial
Reference System (ICRS) shall be the Third Realization of the International Celestial
Reference Frame (ICRF3), as constructed by the IAU Working Group on the Third Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame;
- the organizations responsible for astrometric and geodetic VLBI observing programs (e.g. IVS) take appropriate measures to continue and develop such programs, at
multiple radio frequencies and with a specific effort on the southern hemisphere, to both
maintain and improve ICRF3
- the organizations responsible for defining high-accuracy reference frames at other
wavelengths take appropriate measures, together with the International Earth Rotation
and Reference Systems Service (IERS), to align those reference frames onto ICRF3 with
the highest possible accuracy.
The International Terrestrial Reference Frame
(ITRF)
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IUGG 2019 Resolution document.
The IUGG resolves:
- to recommend to the user community that the ITRF be the standard terrestrial reference
frame for positioning, satellite navigation and Earth Science applications, as well as for
the definition and alignment of national and regional reference frames.
IAU 2021 Resolutions
Earth Rotation Models
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2021 B2 Resolution document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends:
- to encourage a prompt improvement of the Earth rotation theory regarding its accuracy,
consistency, and ability to model and predict the essential EOP
- that the definition of all the EOP, and related theories, equations, and ancillary models
governing their time evolution, must be consistent with the reference frames and the
resolutions, conventional models, products, and standards adopted by the IAU, IUGG/ IAG
and its components
- that the new models should be closer to the dynamically time-varying, actual Earth, and
adaptable as much as possible to future updating of the reference frames and standards
- that the IAU acts in close cooperation with IUGG/IAG and other concerned organization
Gaia Optical Reference Frame (Gaia-CRF)
The following is extracted from the English version of the
IAU 2021 Resolution B3 document
that was passed by the General Assembly.
The IAU recommends:
- that as from 1 January 2022, the fundamental realization of the International Celestial
Reference System (ICRS) shall comprise the Third Realization of the International Celestial
Reference Frame (ICRF3) for the radio domain and the Gaia-CRF3 for the optical domain.